HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9789 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Akela, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Devendra Kumar for Union of India. 1. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that she was married to opposite party No.6 and thereafter some family dispute arose and it is on account of the said matrimonial dispute that the petitioner, who is wife of opposite party No.6, is disputing the claim of opposite party No.6 to be 100 per cent blind. It has been submitted that the petitioner is working as District Youth Officer, Nehru Yuva Kendra, District Moradabad and the allegations levelled against opposite party No.6 is that he has obtained the said job under the disabled scheme claiming himself to be blind. It is in aforesaid circumstances that the petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to constitute a medical board to determine the percentage of blindness of opposite party No.6. 2. When a pointed query was made as to how the petitioner would be aggrieved or under which provision the prayer made in the present petition has been sought but no satisfactory explanation has come forth. In the aforesaid circumstances, we find that the petitioner being wife having a matrimonial dispute with opposite party No.6 has filed this petition which is merely an abuse of the process of the 3. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Akela, Rajesh Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. Smt. Shubhi Bhadauriya .....Petitioner(s) U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Youth Affairs And Sports New Delhi And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) court. It is further noticed that a complaint in this regard is already pending consideration before Director General, Nehru Yuva Kendra, Government of India which has been instituted on 27.8.2025. We do not find that extraordinary long length of time has passed since pendency of the aforesaid application. It is, however, expected that the competent authority shall proceed in the matter in accordance with law. We find that no direction as sought by the petitioner can be granted in exercise of the powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petition is accordingly dismissed. 4. November 6, 2025 RKM. WRIC No. 9789 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench