SHRI SUDHIR KUMAR SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. TRANSPORT DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/11048/2025 · 2025-12-01
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181038 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181038 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11048 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel on behalf of Respondent No. 6 is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents and Shri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for Opposite Party No. 6.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that no further cause of action remains.
4. In light of the aforesaid, this writ petition is consigned to records.
5. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. December 1, 2025 Lokesh Kumar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vishnu Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Shri Sudhir Kumar Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench