Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 181024 (ALL)

PRADEEP KUMAR @ PRADEEP KUMAR DIXIT v. SMT. NEERA SRIVASTAVA AND 10 OTHERS

A227/6343/2025 · 2025-11-13

S Q H Rizvi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6343 of 2025 Court No. - 20 HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Heard Sri Prashant Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, for the following relief: "(i) Issue an appropriate order or direction for expeditious disposal of Regular Suit No. 199/2012 (Mahendra Kumar Srivastava and others vs. Gaya Prasad and others), filed by respondent no.1 to 4, pending before learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Fast Track Court, Lucknow, within a stipulated time frame, in the interest of justice. (ii) Issue an appropriate order or direction for expeditious disposal of application dated 02.09.2025 filed by petitioner under Order 39 Rule 2-A of Code of Civil Procedure, contained as Annexure no.5 to this petition, pending before learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Fast Track Court, Lucknow, within a stipulated time frame. (iii) ...................." 3. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the pleadings in the aforesaid case are complete and the case is fixed for argument since 11.04.2022. He further submits that the petitioner is the defendant no.2 in the aforesaid suit and claims himself to be the main contesting party and due to pendency of the suit, he is facing undue hardship. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prashant Shukla, Devendra Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : Pradeep Kumar @ Pradeep Kumar Dixit .....Petitioner(s) Smt. Neera Srivastava And 10 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. In view of the nature of the order proposed to be passed, the service of notice upon the respondents is dispensed with. 5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served in keeping this writ petition pending. 6. Accordingly, without adverting on merits of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition with a direction to learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Fast Track Court, Lucknow, before whom the aforementioned matter is pending for disposal, to decide the Regular Suit No. 199/2012 (Mahendra Kumar Srivastva and others versus Gaya Prasad and others), strictly in accordance with law after affording due opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, expeditiously and preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, unless there is any legal impediment. It is further directed that no unnecessary adjournments be granted to either of the parties and the adjournment, if prayed for, the same shall be granted only in exceptional circumstances. 7. With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition is disposed of. November 13, 2025 Abhishek Gupta A227 No. 6343 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench