NIRMALA SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A227/6403/2025 · 2025-11-06
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181018 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181018 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6403 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Dileep Kumar Saini, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ashutosh Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel for the State of U.P.
2. After arguing the matter at some length, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the instant petition.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed. November 6, 2025 Preeti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dileep Kumar Saini Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Nirmala Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench