Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180967 (ALL)

SURESH DATT TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/11445/2025 · 2025-11-25

Manjive Shukla, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11445 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation/application dated 04.08.2025 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation/application before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent authority should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation/application of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No. 2/District Magistrate, Sultanpur is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation/application of the petitioner with regard to the compensation payable to him in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. November 25, 2025 akhilesh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prabhakar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Govind Chaturvedi (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Suresh Datt Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AKHILESHWAR KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench