HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3593 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Heard. The present contempt application has been preferred against the alleged non compliance of the judgment and order dated 10.07.2025 passed in Matters Under Article 227 No. 4081 of 2025. The relevant paragraphs of the same are quoted hereinbelow:- "6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, Opposite party No.1 i.e. Nayab Tehsildar Jagdishpur, Tehsil Musafirkhanna, District Amethi is directed to decide the Case No. RST/8928/2024 (Computerized Case No. T202404710208928: Smt Shanti Vs. Smt Sumirata Giri, under Section 34 (Ga) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, pending before him, after giving opportunity of hearing to all the parties, expeditiously, say, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. " Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that copy of the order has been served on 26.07.2025 but till date the case is still pending and no decision has been taken, as such it is a wilful and intentional disobedience of the judgment and order passed in the writ petition on the part of the respondent. After hearing learned counsel for the applicant and going through the record of the case and the order sheets enclosed along with the present case, it is found that since 26.07.2025, the case was listed on nine dates uptill 14.10.2025 out of which on eight dates, the lawyers are abstaining from judicial work, hence the delay in deciding the matter cannot be attributable to the respondent as there is no wilful or intentional disobedience on the part of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mukesh Kumar Sharma, Harikesh Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Smt. Shanti .....Applicant(s) Smt. Namrata Mishra, Naib Tehsildar, Jagdishpur, Tehsil Musafirkhana, Distt. Amethi .....Opposite Party(s) the respondent. In view of the discussion made hereinabove, the present contempt application is devoid of merit and is accordingly dismissed. Notice, if any, stands discharged. However, it is always open for the applicant to approach this Court at the appropriate stage. November 11, 2025 Nitesh CAPL No. 3593 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench