LALA AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE , LUCKNOW AND OTHERS
/10352/2025 · 2025-12-08
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180961 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180961 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10352 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s), learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party no.1 and Sri Vinay Mishra and Sri Vineet Kumar, learned counsels, who have filed power on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. 2. The present application has been filed seeking following main relief :- to quash the impugned Charge the No. 0104/2010 dated 03.07.2010 in respect of Crime No. 193/2010 u/s 323, 324, 504 I.P.C. Police Station Itaunja District Lucknow and quash the order dated 02.02.2011 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Court No. 26, Lucknow as contained in ANNEXURE NO. 1 AND 2 to this petition and also quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 256/2011 State Versus Lala alias Prem Lal and others pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate CBI [A.P.] Lucknow"
3. Learned counsel for both the parties submit that parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court by way of compromise and the original compromise deed has been annexed as Annexure-4 to the application, therefore, the aforesaid case may be decided in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Laxmi Shanker Goswami, Dinesh Kumar Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Lala And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue , Lucknow And Others .....Opposite Party(s)
best be ascertained by the trial court, as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties before the court concerned. 5. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of with a direction to both the parties to appear before the court concerned on 18.12.2025 and file their comprise application. If such compromise application is filed, the court concerned shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise within six weeks from that date. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court making compromise to be part of the record and a report to that effect shall also be send to this Court whether the said compromise took place or not.
The court concerned will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise. It will also be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 6. For a period of three months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid complaint case. 7. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the counsel for the applicant(s) after retaining a photocopy of the same on record. December 8, 2025 Mohit Singh/- A482 No. 10352 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench