Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180958 (ALL)

ASHOK KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.

BAIL/8898/2024 · 2025-10-29

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8898 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 38 of 2024, under Sections 147, 148, 452, 323, 504, 506, 427 & 302 of IPC, PS Akhandnagar, District Sultanpur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the co accused Dharmraj and Danbahadur were enlarged on bail vide order dated 27.10.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 10775 of 2024. The applicant were not named in the FIR for causing the injury concerned. The allegations are similar to the co accused Dharmraj and Dan Bahadur who have been enlarged on bail. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the nature of allegations against the applicant to be similar in terms of FIR, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 27.02.2024 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Ashok Kumar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Alok Singh, Abhishek Mishra, Aishwarya Pandey, Durga Baksh Singh, Saubhagya Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ashok Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 29, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 8898 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench