Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18093 (PAT)

Anju Devi v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/2874/2022 · 2025-01-27

Rajesh Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2874 of 2022 ====================================================== Anju Devi W/o Amit Kumar Mandal, Resident of village- Majgawa, P.S. and District – Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, The Panchayati Raj Department, the Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Collector, Araria. 3. The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Araria. 4. The Superintending Engineer, Panchayat Raj, Araria. 5. The Additional Development Commissioner, Araria. 6. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Araria. 7. The Executive Engineer, Panchayat Raj, Araria. 8. The Assistant Engineer, Panchayat Raj, Araria. 9. The Block Development Officer, Araria. 10. The Circle Officer, Araria. 11. The Techanical Assistant/Junior Engineer, Panchayat Raj, Araria. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Archana Meenakshee, GP-6 Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, AC to GP-06 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 6 27-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with the liberty to move before the appropriate forum/authority. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of. kiran/- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U