Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18091 (RAJ)

KAMLESH S/O PYARCHAND v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6033/2025 · 2025-05-19

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:20958] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6033/2025 1. Kamlesh S/o Pyarchand, R/o Gram Nimoda, Police Station Javda, District Chittorgarh (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi) 2. Antim S/o Banshi Lal, R/o Gram Nimoda, Police Station Javda, District Chittorgarh (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi) ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Thorugh Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6034/2025 Rajesh S/o Babu Lal, R/o Gram Nimoda, Police Station Javda, District Chittorgarh (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Bundi). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Asgar Khan with Mr. Junaid Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 19/05/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.73/2025 registered at Police Station-Dabi, District-Bundi for the offences under Section 8/15 of NDPS Act. Since both the bail applications have arisen from common order, hence, they are being decided by this single order. [2025:RJ-JP:20958] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6033/2025] 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The so called recovered contraband article is less than commercial quantity. There are no criminal antecedents against them. Petitioners are behind the bars since 11.04.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Kamlesh S/o Pyarchand, Antim S/o Banshi Lal and Rajesh S/o Babu Lal shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each of them to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/210-211