RAJESH GUPTA AND 3 OTHERS v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. GOVT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
A482/9197/2025 · 2025-10-31
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180909 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180909 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9197 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Sri Santosh Kumar Singh, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the private respondents, which is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the private respondents as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
3. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:-
"To quash the entire proceeding of Session Trial No. 264 of 2016 (State Versus Jawahar Lal and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 69 of 2016, Under Section- 147, 323 & 325 I.P.C., relating to Police Station-Kotwali Nagar, District- Faizabad/Ayodhya pending in the court of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Room No. 6, Ayodhya as well as impugned charge-sheet No. 92/2016, dated 26.02.2016, submitted against the petitioners under section-147, 323 & 325 I.P.C. by the investigating officer in aforesaid case crime number, as contained in Annexure No. 1 to this instant petition, in the light of compromise, attained between the parties."
4. Learned counsel for the applicants prays for and is permitted to correct the description of the respondent no.5, forthwith.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.3 Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vishwanath Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Santosh Kumar Singh Rajesh Gupta And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
to the application.
5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court.
6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record.
7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.
8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.
9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the
learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. October 31, 2025 Arpan A482 No. 9197 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench