Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180905 (ALL)

GUDDU @ MUJAHID v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/8848/2025 · 2025-11-14

Abdul Moin, Babita Rani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8848 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. states on the basis of instructions dated 18.09.2025 sent by Shri Siyaram Chaurasia, S.I., Police Station Purwa, District Unnao that the name of Smt. Zainab has been deleted from the F.I.R. 2. The aforesaid statement is taken on record. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents no.1 to 3, and Shri Ashish Chandra Asthana, Advocate holding brief of Shri Amit Tewari, learned counsel for the respondents No.4 & 5. 2. Instant petition has been filed praying for quashing of the first information report dated 27.08.2024 bearing F.I.R. / Case Crime No.0213 of 2024, under Sections 137(2), 87, 142 of B.N.S., lodged at Police Station Purwa, District Unnao. 3. Upon filing of the petition, it was contended that the petitioner and respondents No.4 & 5 have entered into a compromise vide the compromise deed dated 11.09.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-6 to the petition. 4. This Court, vide order dated 28.10.2025, had required the compromise deed to be placed before the learned Senior Registrar of this Court for verification of the said compromise. 5. In pursuance to the order of this Court dated 28.10.2025, the Senior Registrar of this Court, vide his report dated 06.11.2025, has verified the compromise between the petitioner and respondents Nos.4 & 5. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pranav Pandey, Purusottam Awasthi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Amit Tewari, Kumar Namami Dixit Guddu @ Mujahid .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) 6. As per the said compromise, the petitioner and respondents No.4 & 5 have agreed to end the dispute between themselves amicably. 7. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is allowed. The first information report dated 27.08.2024 bearing F.I.R. / Case Crime No.0213 of 2024, under Sections 137(2), 87, 142 of B.N.S., lodged at Police Station Purwa, District Unnao and its consequential proceedings, are quashed. November 14, 2025 S. Shivhare CRLP No. 8848 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench