Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180900 (MAD)

P.Sandirasegarane v. The Secretary To Government

REV.APLW/23/2021 · 2025-12-08

C Kumarappan, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Review Appln.(Writ).No.23 of 2021 --------------------------------------------- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08.12.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Review Appln. (Writ) No.23 of 2021 P.Sandirasegarane ...Petitioner Vs. The Secretary to Government, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms (Personal Wing), Chief Secretariat, Beach Road, Government of Puducherry, Puducherry – 605 001. ...Respondent PRAYER : This Review Application has been filed under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying to review the order dated 07.09.2020 passed in W.P.No.10676 of 2020 and allow the same as prayed for. For Petitioner : Mr.M.N.Kathir For Respondents : Mr.R.Syed Mustafa Spl. Govt. Pleader (Puducherry) ******* ---------------- Page No.:1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Review Appln.(Writ).No.23 of 2021 --------------------------------------------- O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The order sought to be reviewed has been passed by this Court on 07.09.2020 made in W.P.No.10676 of 2020. 2. The Review petitioner has instituted an Original Application before the Central Administrative Tribunal challenging the order of transfer. Since it came to be dismissed, the Writ Petition came to be filed. The Division Bench of this Court also disposed of the Writ Petition granting four weeks time to the petitioner to rejoin from the date of removing the lockdown as indicated by the Central Administrative Tribunal. 3. This order though passed in the year 2020 and the Review Application was filed in the year 2021, the same is listed for admission today i.e., on 08.12.2025. The petitioner has made an attempt to re- adjudicate the merits, which is impermissible in a review proceeding. In the even of not establishing error apparent on record, the review Application is not maintainable. Since the said element is missing, this Court is not inclined to entertain the Review Application. ---------------- Page No.:2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Review Appln.(Writ).No.23 of 2021 --------------------------------------------- 4. Consequently, Review Application stands dismissed. No costs. (S.M.S., J.) (C.K., J.) 08.12.2025 dsa Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Neutral Citation :Yes/No To: The Secretary to Government, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms (Personal Wing), Chief Secretariat, Beach Road, Government of Puducherry, Puducherry – 605 001. ---------------- Page No.:3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Review Appln.(Writ).No.23 of 2021 --------------------------------------------- S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and C.KUMARAPPAN, J. dsa Review Appln. (Writ) No.23 of 2021 08.12.2025 ---------------- Page No.:4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis