Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18090 (ALL)

M/S BALAJI ENTERPRISES v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/11037/2022 · 2025-10-08

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 11037 of 2022 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sandeep Kumar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition have prayed for the following relief:- " Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 03.02.2020 passed by the Respondent no.2, by means of which appeal filed by the petitioner under section 77 of U.P. Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 has been dismissed and the impugned order dated 11.07.2017 passed by the respondent no.3, whereby directing the petitioner to deposit Rs.5,29,40,175.00 through treasury chalan for illegal mining of 1,11,453 cubic meter." 3. Sri Sandeep Kumar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel submits that the controversy in the instant case is settled by judgment of this Court in a bunch of writ petition leading of which is Writ-C No.- 13948 of 2020 (M/S Shalimar Stone Crusher Thru. Prop. Labh Singh Vs. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Geology and Mining and others). Accordingly, he submits that the present writ petition may also be decided in terms of order passed in Writ-C No.- 13948 of 2020 (M/S Shalimar Stone Crusher Thru. Prop. Labh Singh Vs. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Geology and Mining and others). 4. In view of submissions advanced by learned Additional Chief Standing Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nipun Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. M/S Balaji Enterprises .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel, the impugned orders dated 03.02.2020 and 11.07.2017 are quashed and the writ petition is allowed in terms of direction contained in order dated 19.11.2022 passed in Writ-C No.- 13948 of 2020 (M/S Shalimar Stone Crusher Thru. Prop. Labh Singh Vs. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Geology and Mining and others). October 9, 2025 Virendra WRIC No. 11037 of 2022 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR BHARTEEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad