YASHPAL CHAUDHARY @ YASHPAL YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO AND 2 OTHERS
/11075/2025 · 2025-11-26
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180894 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180894 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11075 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA appearing on behalf of the respondents no.1 & 2.
2. No notice need be issued to the respondent no. 3 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed.
3. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for quashing of the First Information Report dated 20.02.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 0088 of 2025 under Section 87 of B.N.S, 2023 at Police Station- Padua District- Lakhimpur Kheri, a copy of which is annexure 1 to the writ petition.
3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that from a perusal of the allegations as levelled in the First Information Report it emerges that the respondent no. 3 has lodged the aforesaid First Information Report contending that the petitioner has enticed away his wife who has left her house along with three children.
4. Contention is that apart from the fact that the impugned First Information Report does not have any iota of truth, the other aspect of the matter is that the petitioner is not involved in the matter.
5. On the other hand, learned AGA on the basis of instructions states that the investigation is still going on and no credible evidence has been found against the petitioner till date. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Yashpal Chaudhary @ Yashpal Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
6. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with the directions to the respondents-authorities not to take any coercive action against the petitioner till such time any credible evidence is found against him.
7. Needless to mention that the petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation. In case of non cooperation, the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. November 26, 2025 Pachhere/- CRLP No. 11075 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench