Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180889 (ALL)

AKHTAR ALI QURESHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PANCHAYATI RAJ LKO. U.P. AND 13 OTHERS

/11499/2025 · 2025-11-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11499 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated 25.10.2025 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent authority should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent authorities concerned are directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the private Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prabhakar Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Akhtar Ali Qureshi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Lko. U.P. And 13 Others .....Respondent(s) respondents. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. November 28, 2025 Ashutosh WRIC No. 11499 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench