Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18087 (RAJ)

SATNAMI SHARAN SRIVASTAWA S/O LATE SHRI MADHO NARAIN JI SRIVASTAWA v. NAGAR NIGAM THROUGH MAYOR, NAGAR NIGAM, JAIPUR

CSA/239/2019 · 2025-07-22

Narendra Singh Dhaddha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:27289] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 239/2019 1. Satnami Sharan Srivastawa S/o Late Shri Madho Narain Ji Srivastawa, B/c Kayasth, Resident Of F-25, Madhuban Colony, Kisan Marg, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur (Died During Suit) Through Lrs 1/1. Smt Pushplata W/o Late Shri Satnami Sharan Srivastawa, Aged About 76 Years, B/c Kayasth, Resident Of F-25, Madhuban Colony, Kisan Marg, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur 1/2. Alok Srivastawa S/o Late Shri Satnami Sharan Srivastawa, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of F-25, Madhuban Colony, Kisan Marg, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur 1/3. Smt. Sunita Srivastawa W/o Shri Raj Kumar Ji D/o Late Shri Satnami Sharan Srivastawa, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of F-25, Madhuban Colony, Kisan Marg, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur 1/4. Smt. Vinita Srivastawa W/o Shri Mukesh Srivastawa D/o Late Shri Satnami Sharan Srivastawa, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of F-25, Madhuban Colony, Kisan Marg, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur ----Appellants Versus 1. Nagar Nigam Through Mayor, Nagar Nigam, Jaipur, Deen Dayal Upadhayay Bhawan, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur 2. Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Civil Lines Zone, Lal Kothi, Jaipur 3. Satish Kumar Bakliwal S/o Shri Chand Mal Ji Jain, Resident Of F-25, Madhuban Colony, Kisan Marg, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Mohd. Adil For Respondent(s) : None HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 22/07/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:27289] (2 of 2) [CSA-239/2019] Matter comes up on an application No. 1/2025 for returning the original documents (Ex.1 and Ex.2) to the appellants after retaining certified copies of the same on record, which are annexed along with the application as Annx. 1 and 2. Learned counsel for the appellants wants to withdraw this second appeal. The civil second appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Office is directed to return the original documents to the appellant No.1/2, who is present in the court today, his signatures have been obtained on the court’s order sheet and who has been identified by his advocate, after retaining certified copies of the same on record, on the condition that the appellants shall furnish an undertaking before the Registrar (Judicial) of this court to the effect that they shall produce the original documents as and when called upon to do so and/or the original documents are summoned by the court. They shall also mention in the aforesaid undertaking that they shall not destroy the aforesaid original documents and shall keep the same in good condition in which the said documents are in front of this court. Application stands disposed of accordingly. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Ritu/109