Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180867 (ALL)

SACHINDRA NATH @ SACHINDRA NATH VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. RURAL DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/12835/2025 · 2025-11-04

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12835 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Since, the present matter is being decided at the admission stage, therefore, notice to opposite party no. 3 is hereby dispensed with. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Dr. Udai Veer Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs :- (i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding and directing the Opposite parties to sanction/approved the pay scale of the petitioner equivalent to the pay scale of Dr.Uday Bhan Singh, Prasar Prasikshan Adhikari, providing the personal promotional pay scale Rs. 3000- 4500 (Rs.10000-15200) on 12.09.1999 in accordance with office memo no. S- 478/38-2-2008 dated 07.10.2005 and pay the arrears of the salary along with 10 percent interest. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding and directing the Opposite parties to re-determine the pension of the petitioner in accordance with, along with Interest." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted a representation on 10- 09-2025 before the opposite party no. 1/Principal Secretary, Rural Development, U.P., Lucknow and the same is pending consideration. He further submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the opposite party no. 1 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suresh Chandra Srivastava, Dr. Ajai Pratap Singh Chauhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sachindra Nath @ Sachindra Nath Verma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Rural Development Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) by this court. Learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case, the opposite party no. 1/Principal Secretary, Rural Development, U.P., Lucknow, is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 10-09-2025 within the period of two months, in accordance with law, from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. November 4, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 12835 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench