HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10509 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated October 6, 2025 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.3 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No.3/ General Manager (Service) is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. 7. We make it clear that we have not gone into the merits of the case Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aakash Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Surya Prakash Singh Dilshad Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Agriculture Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) and the respondent No.3 shall be at liberty to pass a reasoned order in accordance with law. November 13, 2025 cks/- WRIC No. 10509 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench