Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 / 4
2025:CGHC:18494
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2733 of 2025 1 - Smt. Shashi Prabha Dewangan W/o Shri Naresh Kumar Dewangan Aged About 55 Years Occupation Lecturer Lb Government Higher Secondary School Farfaud Arang Raipur District (C.G.)
--- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Panchayat Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Atl Nagar Mantralay New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Mantralay New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - District Education Officer, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Director Lok Shikshan Sanchalnalaya, Indrawati Bhavan, New Raipur, Atal Nagar District Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Mukhya Karyapalan Adhikari Jila Panchayat Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
--- Respondent(s) SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.04.24 18:38:50 +0530
2 / 4 with WPS No. 2748 of 2025 1 - Smt. Aradhna Jha W/o Shri Manish Kumar Jha Aged About 53 Years Occupation - Lecturer L.B., Government Higher Secondary School, Mana Basti, Raipur District (C.G.)
---Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Panchayat Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Mantralay, New Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Mantralay, New Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - District Education Officer Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Director, Lok Shikshan Sanchalnalaya, Indrawati Bhavan, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Mukhya Karyapalan Adhikari Jila Panchayat Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)
--- Respondent(s) with WPS No. 2767 of 2025 1 - Smt. Jaishri Sahu W/o Shri Raghunandan Prasad Sahu Aged About 59 Years Occupation Lecturer (L.B.) At Posted Government Higher Secondary School, Mana Basti Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 / 4
---Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Mantralay New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - District Education Officer Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Director Lok Shikshan Sanchalnalaya, Indrawati Bhavan, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Mukhya Karyapalan Adhikari Jila Panchayat Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ...
Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Nasimuddin Ansari alongwith Mr. Riyazuddin Sheikh, Advocates For Respondents/ State : Mr. Ajit Singh, Govt. Advocate and Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiya, Dy. Govt. Advocate (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU)
Order on Board 24/04/2025
1. Since identical issues involved in the above mentioned writ petitions, they are being heard and decided by this common order.
2. By the present writ petitions, the petitioners who are working as Lecturer (LB) in the School Education Department preferred the present writ petition seeking a direction towards the respondent
4 / 4 authority to consider the initial date of appointment of the petitioners i.e. 06.10.1998 & 09.09.1998 respectively for giving the benefit of old pension scheme.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have submitted representations before the Secretary/respondent authorities and the same are pending, it has not been decided till date. Learned counsel for the petitioners are seeking a limited direction to the respondents to consider and decide the representations pending before the respondent authorities.
4.
Learned counsel for the respondents/ State submits that looking to the limited prayer of the petitioners, these writ petitions can be
disposed of with a direction to the Secretary to consider the representations within a stipulated period.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents.
6. Looking to the fact that the representations of the petitioners are pending since 2023, the concerned authority/ respondent No. 2 is
directed to consider and decide the respective representations of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of 50 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
7. With the aforesaid direction, all these Writ Petitions stand
disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU)
JUDGE $. Bhilwar