HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9467 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Ashutosh Kumar Tiwari, Advocate on behalf of the opposite party No.2 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P., learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and perused the record. 3. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the entire proceeding of S.T. No. 19 of 2020 including the summoning order dated 19.07.2025, pursuant to chargesheet dated 12.02.2019 arising out of case crime no.0004 of 2019, u/s 376, 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC, P.S. Bewana, District- Ambedkar Nagar pending in the court of Additional District and Session Judge, F.T.C., Ambedkar Nagar. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned counsel for opposite party No.2 jointly submitted that vide order dated 15.05.2025 passed in Application u/s 482 CrpC No. 4010 of 2025, a direction was given to the trial court to verify the factum of compromise executed by the parties. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, learned trial court had verified the contents of compromise. 5. Learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 jointly submitted that the parties have entered into compromise, which has duly been verified by the trial court vide report/order dated 19.07.2025. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ramesh Chandra Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Satyam And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Learned A.G.A. has fairly conceded that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified by the trial court. 7. Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of decisions has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice as has been held in Gian Singh Vs State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties. 8. In view of the aforesaid and the fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further, the matter is purely of personal nature, which has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the compromise, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 9. For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed and the entire proceeding of S.T. No. 19 of 2020 including the summoning order dated 19.07.2025, pursuant to chargesheet dated 12.02.2019 arising out of case crime no.0004 of 2019, u/s 376, 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC, P.S. Bewana, District- Ambedkar Nagar pending in the court of Additional District and Session Judge, F.T.C., Ambedkar Nagar. are hereby quashed. 10. Office is directed to communicate this order to learned trial Court, forthwith. November 13, 2025 Raj A482 No. 9467 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench