Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18083 (KAR)

NARAYANA MOGAVEERA v. M/S SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO. LTD.,

CRL.P/2211/2023 · 2025-07-02

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23808 CRL.P No. 2211 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2211 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: NARAYANA MOGAVEERA S/O SUBRAYA MOGERA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/O HOUSE NO.12/354, KODI ROAD NEAR SHANISHWARA TEMPLE, KOTESHWRA, KUNDAPURA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRANEETH G N, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: M/S SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO. LTD., S/O HONAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS HAVING THE REGD OFFICE AT 123, ANGAPPAN NAICAKAN STREET, CHENNAI-1 AND BRANCH OFFICE AT I FLOOR, ST.MARIA COMPLEX VODERHOBLI VILLAGE, KUNDAPURA TALUK REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER PRAKASH MESTA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.NARAYAN SWAMY, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23808 CRL.P No. 2211 of 2023 THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT IN CC NO. 74/2017 IN THE HONBLE COURT OF ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KUNDAPURA, FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 138 NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT AND FURTHER PROCEEDINGS THEREON. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for respondent has filed memo reporting closure of loan account. 2. A copy of loan closure letter and printout of CIS in C.C.No.1496/2023 are produced. The same is taken on record. 3. However, there is no representation for petitioner. 4. On 19.06.2025, a conditional order was passed to the effect that if office objections are not complied with, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23808 CRL.P No. 2211 of 2023 necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition. 5. Despite the said order, office objections have not been complied with. It appears petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8