FAO-4795 IN THE HIG 235-B Kamlesh Gu Charanjit Sin CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. seeking enha him vide Aw Claims Trib 24.12.2025 2. the main app on the first appellant ha hearing i.e. following or well as in the 95-2019 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA FAO Date o sh Gupta @ Kamlesh Kumar Versus njit Singh and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present appeal has been g enhancement of compensation amou Award dated 19.03.2019 passed b s Tribunal, Amritsar in MACP Ca 2025. The matter pertains to the year in appeal is yet to be issued. Perusal o e first 02 dates of hearing i.e. 13.0 ant had gone un-represented. Thereaf g i.e. 15.02.2025 the appellant ha ing order has been passed by this C the other connected appeals:- “Perusal of the file rev hearing i.e. 13.03.2023, notices their counsel (in all cases) were Pursuant thereto, as per for the appellant(s) have been fixed; whereas notice(s) issue cases) have been received back has put in appearance on their In the interest of justice, a ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-4795-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.04.2026 .… Appellant .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA been filed by the injured/claimant n amount of ₹2,27,628/- awarded to ssed by the learned Motor Accident P Case No. 291 of 2015 dated e year 2019 and notice of motion in rusal of the order-sheets shows that . 13.03.2023 and 15.02.2025, the hereafter, again on the next date of ant had gone un-represented and this Court in the present appeal as reveals that on the last date of tices to the appellant(s) as well as were ordered to be issued. per office report, learned counsel een duly informed about the date ssued to the appellant(s) (in all back duly served. However, none heir behalf. ice, adjourned to 31.07.2025. d to dent ted in the e of nd l as of as sel te all ne RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.01 12:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. FAO-4795 3. adjourned f appellant(s) Today again despite the c 4. has exhibite litigation. It Court has be interest of ju casual and c counsel is vide order o filed by the granted to re herein has b Court is left non-prosecu 5. 6. 29.04.2026 rishu 95-2019 (O&M) -2- A photocopy of this ord other connected cases.” On the last date of hearing i.e ned for today; on account of no ant(s) in connected appeals bearing FA again, none has put in appearance e the case having been called twice. A bare reading of the above f xhibited an utterly casual attitude in ion. It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording oppor t of justice. On the other hand, the ap and careless approach. It is clear tha seriously interested in pursuing t rder of even date the connected app y the owner of the offending car ch d to respondent No. 4-Insurance Com has been dismissed for non-prosecut is left with no other option except to rosecution, as well. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable order be placed on the files of ing i.e. 31.07.2025, the matter was of non-appearance on behalf of ing FAO Nos. 3397 and 3400-2019. arance on behalf of the appellant ove facts shows that the appellant tude in his pursuit of the present t very valuable public time of the opportunities to the appellant in the the appellant has adopted an utterly ear that neither the appellant nor his suing the present matter. Moreover, appeal bearing FAO-3400-2019 challenging the recovery rights e Company vide Award impugned osecution by this Court. Thus, this ept to dismiss the instant appeal for any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No of was of 019. llant llant sent the the terly , 019 ghts ned this for RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.01 12:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.