RAM AUTAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/3829/2025 · 2025-11-13
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180793 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180793 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3829 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.24 of 2025, under Sections 3(5), 105, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 238(B) of BNS, Police Station Kachhauna, District Hardoi. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that on 22.01.2025 at about 7:00 PM (evening), all the accused, named in the FIR, came armed with Lathi- Dand and started hurling abuses and on the resistance, they started beating which resulted in substantial injury to the deceased, who subsequently was died. The cause of death as per the postmortem report is ante mortem injury, which are two in number. General allegations were levelled against all the accused persons. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering general allegation assigned to all the accused including the applicant coupled with the nature of the injury, which are on non-vital part and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 27.01.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed . Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Girija Shankar Tripathi, Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, Ramendra Pratap Singh, Somin Singh, Vaibhav Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ram Autar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Let the applicant Ram Autar be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 13, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 3829 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench