- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1199 WP No. 5699 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 5699 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. T.BHASKAR NAIDU S/O LATE SRI. T.SIDDAYA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO.62, 3RD MAIN, 7TH CROSS, 3RD PHASE, 5TH BLOCK, BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE, VISVESWARAIAHNAGAR, BENGALURU-560 085. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.PRASANNA KUMAR., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: THE NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, NO.73/1 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, GANDHI BANZAR MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560 004. REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1199 WP No. 5699 of 2021 ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. His absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 07.01.2025, on that day, though matter called twice, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the office was directed to list the matter under the caption 'for dismissal' on 13.01.2025. The petition is listed today under the caption 'for dismissal'. As could be seen from the petition papers, the petition is filed in the year 2021. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The petition is pending from four years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. In view of peremptory order dated 07.01.2025, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25