Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180785 (ALL)

MAKSUD AHEMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO

BAIL/9427/2025 · 2025-11-03

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9427 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the informant despite the notice. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.319 of 2025, under Sections 64(2)M, 308(5), 356(2), 351(2) B.N.S. and Section 67 of IT Act, P.S.- Kotwali Nagar, District- Pratapgarh. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the victim met the applicant a long time ago and started talking to him. The applicant after enticing her, started blackmailing her and committed wrong with her. In the statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS, the victim admitted that she was in love with the applicant. The tentative age of the victim is 21 years. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the material on record and the statement of victim, in which, she has admitted that she was in love with the applicant coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 11.08.2025, having criminal antecedents two cases, in which, he is on bail, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Maksud Ahemad be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sukh Deo Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Maksud Ahemad .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s) Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 3, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 9427 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench