RAGHVENDRA PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P.THRU.PRIN.SECY.DEPTT.OF ELECTRICITY and ORS.
WRIA/446/2021 · 2025-11-27
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180780 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180780 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 446 of 2021 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 27, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dr. Ashutosh Mishra, Manish Jauhari (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Raghvendra Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy.Deptt.Of Electricity And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench