Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18078 (RAJ)

ANSHDEEP SINGH SON OF SHRI RAVINDRA SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/7473/2025 · 2025-05-22

Anand Sharma, Inderjeet Singh

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:21564-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7473/2025 Anshdeep Singh Son of Shri Ravindra Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Baruni, Tehsil Kishanganj, District Baran (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through its Secretary, Education Department, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj). 2. State of Project Director and Commissioner, School Shiksha Parishad, Jaipur. 3. District Collector, Baran, District Baran (Raj). 4. District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Baran, District Baran (Raj). 5. Additional District Project Co-Ordinator, Samagra Shiksa, Baran, District Baran (Raj). 6. Sub Divisional Officer, Kishanganj, District Baran (Raj). 7. Chief Block Education Officer, Kishanganj, District Baran (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mayank Kumar Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Basant Singh Chhaba, AAG with Mr. Avinash Choudhary & Mr. Hardik Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 22/05/2025 1. This PIL petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 02.01.2024 passed by the respondents with regard to constructions of boys hostel for Schedule Tribe [2025:RJ-JP:21564-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-7473/2025] Community adjoining the school premises (Rajkiya Uchh Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Baruni, District Baran). 2. Grievance of the petitioner is that for construction of school premises, the respondents are cutting the trees. 3. We have gone through the record, no specific record has been produced by the petitioner along with this writ petition with regard to the plantation of the trees. 4. In our considered view construction of hostel along with school premises is necessary for the boys to reside belonging to the Schedule Tribe Community for their upliftment. 5. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference. Hence, this PIL petition is dismissed. 6. Pending application/s, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J DIVYA /45