Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180757 (ALL)

PRAMOD @ PAPPU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/9907/2025 · 2025-11-12

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9907 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Shri Devendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 93 of 2025 under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1), 109(1), 351(3) BNS, P.S. Harpalpur, District Hardoi. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that co accused Rohit, Ashok, Manjesh and Banwarilal @ Karru with similar allegations have been enlarged on bail vide orders dated 7.10.2025, 8.10.2025, 8.10.2025 and 8.10.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application Nos. 9575 of 2025, 7506 of 2025, 8009 of 2025 and 6940 of 2025 respectively 5. Learned AGA and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 16.3.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant Pramod @ Pappu be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajat Pratap Singh, Rahul Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pramod @ Pappu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 12, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 9907 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench