SMT. SNEHLATA SRIVASTAVA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. TECHNICAL EDU. LKO AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/12093/2025 · 2025-10-31
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180742 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180742 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12093 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the dues have been paid to the petitioners, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous as the same has lost its efficacy.
2. In view of aforesaid statement given by counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
4. Consigned to the records. October 31, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Lalit Shukla (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Smt. Snehlata Srivastava And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Technical Edu. Lko And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench