Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18074 (HP)

HARBANS LAL v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/10096/2025 · 2025-06-24

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.10096 of 2025 Date of decision: 24.06.2025 Harbans Lal. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. R.L. Verma and Mr. Davinder Bhatt, Advocates. For the respondents : Ms. Leena Guleria, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioner seeks benefits of the decision rendered in Satya Devi Vs. State of H.P. and Others1. 2. Learned Deputy Advocate General submits that the judgment in case of Satya Devi1 has been assailed by the respondents by filing Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.20496/2024. The common decision passed in several other matters connected with Satya Devi’s1 case has also been assailed by the respondents by filing separate Special Leave Petitions including State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Vs. Inder Pal2. Copy of an order passed by the Hon’ble 1CWP No. 2274 of 2021 and connected matters. decided on 28.05.2024. 2Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 11306/2025. -2- Apex Court on 24.03.2025 in several connected Special Leave Petitions with lead case State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Vs. Inder Pal2 was perused, which reads as under:- “1. Delay condoned. 2. Let the notice be issued to the respondent(s) in all the matters. 3. Tag alongwith SLP© No. 20496/2024. 4. In the meantime the operation of the impugned order(s) is/are stayed.” In view of the fact that operation of impugned order(s) (common judgment rendered on 28.05.2024) in all connected Special Leave Petition has been stayed by the Hon’ble Apex Court, this writ petition is disposed of with direction that benefits, if any, flowing to the petitioner under Satya Devi’s1 case, shall abide by the outcome of the Inder Pal’s2 case instituted by the respondents against the common judgment rendered in Satya Devi’s1 case. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 24th June, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)