RAKESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY., REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/6999/2025 · 2025-12-03
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180738 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180738 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6999 of 2025 Court No. - 22 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.
1. Heard Sri Gyanendra Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Devi Prasad Singh, learned Standing Counsel.
2. The instant petition has been filed seeking direction to Addl. Commissioner (Judicial) Ayodhya Mandal Ayodhya to consider and decide the stay application filed by the petitioner along with memo of appeal having Appeal No. 3041 of 2025 (computerized no. C202504000003041), under Section 207 U.P. Revenue Code as well as the appeal, pending before Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Ayodhya Mandal Ayodhya.
3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the stay application in appeal filed against the order passed under Section 116 of the Code has been pending and the same may be directed to be decided expeditiously.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Addl. Commissioner (Judicial) Ayodhya Mandal Ayodhya to decide the stay application of the petitioner in Appeal No. 3041 of 2025 in terms of directions issued by this Court in the judgement of Daya Shankar vs. State of U.P. and others, reported in 2023 (6) ADJ 181. December 3, 2025 Vandana Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gyanendra Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Rakesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy., Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench