Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180726 (ALL)

RAM SEVAK AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. LABOUR DEPTT. AND 2 OTHERS

/11727/2025 · 2025-12-08

Amitabh Kumar Rai, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11727 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. This petition has been filed with the following main prayer :- "To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.3 – Principal, U.P. Sports College, Kursi Road, Lucknow to make payment of Rs.2,02,389/- to each petitioner in pursuance of award dated 22.09.2021 passed by Presiding Officer, Labour Court, U.P. Lucknow in Adjudication Dispute Case no.65 of 2000 forthwith." Shri Ashutosh Shahi, Advocate has filed his power on behalf of respondent no.3. He has raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the writ petition. He says that notice in an application under Section 6 (N) of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act is pending before the Labour Court and simultaneously this writ petition has been filed. This writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to pursue their remedy under Section 6 (N) of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 before the court concerned where it is stated to be pending. December 8, 2025 mks Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Pandey, Sandhya Bharti Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ashutosh Shahi (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Ram Sevak And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Labour Deptt. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench