Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180725 (ALL)

PUSKAR SRIVASTAVA v. SONAL SRIVASTAVA AND ANR.

TACR/48/2012 · 2025-11-04

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 48 of 2012 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Case called out in revised list. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the applicant(s) to press this application. However, learned A.G.A. is present in the Court. 2. It appears that the applicant(s) and the counsel engaged by the applicant(s) both have lost the interest in the case and are not interested in pursuing the application, which is pending since 2012. 3. It would be appropriate to refer two maxims:- (i) Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt (The law assists only those who are vigilant, and not those who sleep over their rights); and (ii) Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium (In the interest of the society as a whole, the litigation must come to an end). The above said two maxims are sister provisions, which would highlight and spotlight that the party seeking remedy before the Court should be vigilant, otherwise, the law would not come to their help and there should be end to litigation. 4. Considering the aforesaid, this Court feels that the application should not be disposed of on merits and should be dismissed for non-prosecution. Accordingly, it is dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 4, 2025 Jyoti/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : S.S Lal Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Puskar Srivastava .....Applicant(s) Sonal Srivastava And Anr. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench