SADHNA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
ABAIL/1078/2025 · 2025-11-25
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180695 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180695 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1078 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant was enlarged on interim bail on 23.09.2025 and there is no material to demonstrate that the applicant has misused the liberty.
3. It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that the proceedings have been initiated on the basis of a complaint.
4. Considering the aforesaid fact that the interim bail granted vide order dated 23.09.2025 is confirmed and the applicant, namely, Sadhna Devi is granted anticipatory bail till conclusion of the trial.
5. The anticipatory bail application is allowed in above terms. November 25, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Neeraj Sahu Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Javed Khan, Juned Khan (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Sadhna Devi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench