HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 3rd Bail Application No. 6032/2025 Ramphool Meena S/o Ramulal Meena, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village Kankata @ Raghunathpura, Presently Resided at Chaksu, Tehsil Chaksu, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined in Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Saini For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Rathore-PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta-Asstt. Govt. Advocate Mr. Chitrank Sharma JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 12/05/2025 1. This 3rd bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by petitioner in connection with the FIR No.487/2023 registered at Police Station Chaksu, District Jaipur City (South) wherein he is charged for the offences punishable under Sections 149, 148, 147, 504, 341, 323, 302 and 452 IPC (later on, he is charged for the offences under Sections 302, 307, 452, 323, 341, 325, 504, 147, 148 and 149 IPC). 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the first bail application of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 30.04.2024, granting liberty to him to renew his prayer for bail after recording the statements of the injured eye witnesses. (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6032/2025] Counsel submits that after passing of the aforesaid order, now the statements of the injured eye-witnesses namely PW1- Chotturam, PW2-Goverdhan, PW3-Jagdish, PW5- Rinku, PW6-Gendi, PW7- Dholi, PW8-Deepak and PW9-Hemraj have been recorded. Counsel submits that none of these witnesses have stated that the petitioner has inflicted any head injury on the deceased rather some of the witnesses have assigned the said allegation against the co-accused Ashok and some other general allegations have been levelled against the petitioner and co-accused Ashok. Counsel submits that the cause of death of the deceased is head injury. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 17.10.2023 and the trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant opposed the bail application. 4. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the statements of injured eye-witnesses as well as the complainant, wherein no specific overt act has been assigned to the petitioner with regard to the allegations of causing head injury on the deceased and the allegation of head injury has been assigned to the co-accused Ashok and also looking to the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 17.10.2023 and trial will take its own time to conclude and without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 B.N.S.S. (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6032/2025] 5. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Ramphool Meena S/o Ramulal Meena, arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/130