VIPIN YADAV AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
A482/9516/2025 · 2025-11-17
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180637 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180637 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9516 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Sri Naresh Kumar Pathak, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:-
“.... the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the entire proceedings of S.T. No.519 of 2022, Crime No.243 of 2021 (State Versus Vipin Yadav and others) U/S- 363/366/376/504/506 IPC & 3/4 POCSO ACT, P.S.- Jahangirabad, District-Barabanki pending in the Court of Learned Additional District & Adv) Session Judge/Special Judge (POCSO ACT) Court No.45 Barabanki in the interest of justice.”
4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No. 1 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise, within 6 weeks. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Pratap Singh, Shailesh Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vipin Yadav And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of three months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 9.
Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. November 17, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 9516 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench