Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180630 (ALL)

SHADAB AHMAD v. SRI RAHUL SINGH, TEHSILDAR TEHSIL MUSAFIRKHANA DIST. AMETHI

CAPL/2819/2025 · 2025-10-30

Manish Kumar

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2819 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. 1.Learned counsel for the respondent on the basis of instruction received from the respondent has submitted that in compliance of the judgement and order passed by the writ court, the proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revednue Code, 2006 has been decided by order dated 20.12.2024, copy of the same has been provided during course of argument, which is taken on record, photocopy of the same has also been provided to the learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that the judgment and order passed by the writ court has been complied with and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. 3. As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Notice issued earlier, if any, stands discharged. October 30, 2025 S. Kumar Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohammad Asad Mahmood, Shujat Kidwai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Prabhakar Tiwari (Manish Kumar,J.) Shadab Ahmad .....Applicant(s) Sri Rahul Singh, Tehsildar Tehsil Musafirkhana Dist. Amethi .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench