HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 530 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State, Shri Utkarsh Srivastava, holding brief of Shri Rakesh Pathak, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the charge-sheet has also been forwarded against the petitioners and as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners do not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate stage. November 26, 2025 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yogendra Mishra, Pushpendra Mishra, Ravi Shankar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Rakesh Pathak, Vijay Pathak (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Abdul Rauf And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench