Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18059 (RAJ)

RAVI KUMAR S/O SHRI SATYARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6006/2025 · 2025-06-12

Sameer Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23159] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6006/2025 Ravi Kumar S/o Shri Satyaram, Resident Of Chandarpur, Police Station Kisni, District Mainpuri, At Present R/o 32 Subhash Nagar, Albatiya, Shahganj, Police Station Jagdishpura, Agra (U.P.) (At Present In Central Jail, Bharatpur). ----Accused/Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sogarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P. Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 12/06/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 108/2025 registered at Police Station Mathura Gate, District Bharatpur for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 340(2), 336(4) and 60(a) of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that Co-ordinate Bench of the Court under the akin circumstances and facts has enlarged the accused therein on bail. It is further submitted that accused-applicant is sole bread earner of the family who is aged approximately 41 years. Further, it is submitted that matter in hand is triable by Magistrate. [2025:RJ-JP:23159] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6006/2025] 3. Lastly, it is submitted that there are only two criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicant, wherein, bail has been granted in one of the matter. 4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and has submitted that criminal antecedents are registered against the accused-applicant. 5. Having heard and considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, taking note of the fact that matter is triable by Magistrate; that the applicant is in custody from approximately preceding three months; that Co-ordinate Bench has enlarged the accused therein on bail under akin factual matrix and circumstances; therefore, considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him/her on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Ravi Kumar S/o Shri Satyaram shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. Furthermore, taking note of the criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicant, as an extended interpretation of the provisions of 'community service' as enshrined under the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, and as a reformative approach to re-include the accused-applicant back in the society with a better vision, aim and zeal in life, this court [2025:RJ-JP:23159] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6006/2025] deems it fit to impose an ancillary condition upon the applicant, therefore, it is directed that the accused-applicant shall contribute to the Swach Bharat Abhiyan – initiative of the government, for a period of two months from the date of enlarging on bail, on two hours per day basis, as an honorary work, under the supervision and directions of the SHO qua the FIR (Supra) in consonance with the directions of the Municipal Corporation/Local Administrative authorities concerned. (SAMEER JAIN),J GAURAV/123