Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180579 (ALL)

GAYATRI DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO AND 3 OTHERS

/6678/2025 · 2025-11-24

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6678 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present petition has been preferred for issuing a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Musafirkhana, Sultanpur to decide the Original Suit No. 212 of 2018 (Gayatri Devi Vs. Bal Govind Ojha and Others) preferred by the petitioner, which is pending since the year 2018 within the time as specified by this Court. On being asked from the learned counsel for the petitioner whether petitioner has preferred any urgency application for early disposal of the aforesaid suit before the trial court, learned counsel for the petitioner has replied that an urgency application has been filed but the same has not been filed alongwith the present case. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that present petition may be disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move an afresh urgency application mentioning urgency for early disposal of the aforesaid suit before the Court concerned and if any such application is preferred by the petitioner the same may be decided by the Court concerned within the stipulated time fix by this Court. On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merit of the case, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an afresh urgency application for early disposal of aforesaid suit before the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Musafirkhana, Sultanpur, mentioning urgency thereof. If any such application is preferred, endeavour shall be made by Civil Judge (Junior Division) Musafirkhana, Sultanpur to decide the urgency application preferred by the petitioner looking into the urgency mentioned therein expeditiously in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without providing any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. November 24, 2025 Ashish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar,J.) Gayatri Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench