AMIT KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO AND OTHERS
/7200/2025 · 2025-12-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180577 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180577 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7200 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogendra Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondent is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to respondent No.2 i.e. Tehsildar, Tehsil Sandeela, District Hardoi to decide case No.03228/2018, computerized case No.T 201810330403228 under Section 34/35 of Revenue Code (Mayadevi Vs. Chawkar), expeditiously within the time specified by this Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case aforesaid case is considered and decided in a time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No. 2 i.e. Tehsildar, Tehsil Sandeela, District Hardoi is directed to decide case No.03228/2018, computerized case No.T 201810330403228 under Section 34/35 of Revenue Code (Mayadevi Vs. Chawkar), expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Munendra Kumar, Laxmi Narayan Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Amit Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko And Others .....Respondent(s)
of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 16, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 7200 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench