HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7196 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. C.M. Application No.nil dated 17.12.2025 for amendment in the memo as well in application for interim relief. 1. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. The cause shown in the accompanying affidavit that father's name of opposite party No.s 8, 9 and 10 has wrongly been typed as 'Jairam', while it should be 'Ram Dheeraj", is sufficient. The application is allowed to be carried out during course of the day. Order on memo of the petition. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent while notice on behalf of respondent No.11 has been accepted by Sri Mohan Singh. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.1- Up Zila Adhikari, Milkipur, Ayodhya to decide case No.3455/2024- 25, computerized case No.T 202504230403455 "Jagdamba Prasad and others Vs. Ram Yash and others, under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case aforesaid case is considered and decided in a time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1- Up Zila Adhikari, Milkipur, Ayodhya is directed to decide case No.3455/2024-25, computerized case No.T 202504230403455 "Jagdamba Prasad and others Vs. Ram Yash and others, under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ganga Prasad Mishra, Abhinav Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Jagdamba Prasad And Others .....Petitioner(s) Up Zilaadhikari Milkypur, Faizabad And Others .....Respondent(s) disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 17, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 7196 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench