RAMDEV @ MAHADEV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
/8546/2025 · 2025-12-12
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180561 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180561 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8546 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 166 of 2025 under sections 103(1), 109(1), 3(5) and 238 BNS, P.S. Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that co accused Mohit Kumar, who is the main accused, has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 11.12.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 8282 of 2025.
5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the fact that name of the applicant surfaced in the statement of the witness who has named the main accused Mohit Kumar, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 21.4.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant Ramdev @ Mahadev be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anshuman Singh, Dr. Pooja Singh, Shivangi Paliwal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ramdev @ Mahadev .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 12, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 8546 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench