1 2025:CGHC:17689 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4614 of 2017 • Manoj Dewangan S/o Late Jethuram Dewangan, Aged About 45 Years R/o Near Budhwari Near Gaurishankar Mandir, P. S. Kotwali, District Korba Chhattisgarh. Since The Petitioner Is In Jail In Respect Of Crime No. 309 /15 Registered In P. S. Kotwali, District Korba, The Present Writ Petition Filed Through His Brother Namely Dhanraj Dewangan S/o Late Jethuram Dewangan, Aged About 37 Years R/o Krishna Nagar, Ward 31 Dewangan Mohalla Juna Bilaspur District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Law, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. High Court Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Registrar, High Court Of Chhattisgarh, Bodri, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3. The District And Sessions Judge, Korba, District Korba, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : None appeared even in two round For Respondent No.1/State For Respondents No. 2 and 3 : : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Deputy Government Advocate Mr. R.S. Marhas, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 17/04/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records in related to the case of the petitioners from respondent authorities for its kind perusal. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ / writs, direction / directions, order / orders directing the respondents authority to stay the departmental enquiry during the pendency of the criminal trial.” 2. Learned counsel appearing for respondents No. 2 and 3 would submit that the petition was filed by the petitioner for stay of further proceedings of departmental enquiry. He would contend that another departmental enquiry was initiated against the petitioner and he has been terminated from the services on 31st January, 2025 and thus, the petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Deputy Government Advocate appearing for the State would endorse the submission made by learned counsel for respondents No. 2 and 3. 4. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has already been removed from services in departmental enquiry vide order dated 31.01.2025, in my opinion, nothing survives for adjudication. 5. Consequently, this petition is dismissed. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti