SHAILENDRA KUMAR VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
ABAIL/1761/2024 · 2025-10-29
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180515 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180515 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1761 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The present application has been filed under Section 438 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No. 127 of 2019, under Sections 376 & 506 of IPC and under Section 3/4 of The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, PS Gurubakshganj, District Raebareli.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the applicant was granted the benefit of interim anticipatory bail vide order dated 6.8.2024. The office report indicates that a chargesheet have been filed and the trial is continuing for which non bailable warrant have been issued against the applicant.
4. Considering and adopting the reasoning while granting interim anticipatory bail the same is made final subject to the applicant cooperating with the trial and on the applicant surrendering he shall be enlarged on bail on his furnishing requisite sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
5. The application is disposed of. October 29, 2025 J. K. Dinkar Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : R.B.S. Rathaur Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Shailendra Kumar Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench