1 2025:CGHC:18031 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 358 of 2025 1 - Idfc First Bank Limited Through Its Authorized Officer Sandesh Jain S/o Shri A.K. Jain Aged About 26 Years Having Branch Office At 1st Floor, Satpal Chembers, Civil Line, Near Raj Bhavan, Raipur, Raipur 492001 (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The District Magistrate District- Raipur (C.G.) 492 001 3 - Tahsildar Tehsil - Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 492 001 4 - Maal Jamadar Tehsil - Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 492 001 5 - Chunni Lal Patel S/o Bhanji Bhai Patel R/o New Timber Market, Fafadih, Raipur, District- Raipur 492 001 (C.G.) 6 - Deepak Patel S/o Chunni Lal Patel R/o New Timber Market, Fafadih, Raipur, District- Raipur 492 001 (C.G.) 7 - Dharam Singh Bhai Patel S/o Bhanji Bhai Patel R/o New Timber Market, Fafadih, Raipur, District- Raipur 492 001 (C.G.) 8 - Kapil Patel S/o Amrit Lal Patel R/o New Timber Market, Fafadih, Raipur, District- Raipur 492 001 (C.G.) 9 - Pradeep Patel S/o Dharam Singh Bhai Patel R/o New Timber Market, Fafadih, Raipur, District- Raipur 492 001 (C.G.) 10 - Amrit Lal Patel S/o Bhanji Bhai Patel R/o New Timber Market, Fafadih, Raipur, District- Raipur 492 001 (C.G.) 2 11 - Ramesh Kumar Patel S/o Bhanji Bhai Patel R/o New Timber Market, Fafadih, Raipur, District- Raipur 492 001 (C.G.) 12 - Umiya Saw Mill R/o New Timber Market, Fafadih, Raipur, District- Raipur 492 001 (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Ritesh Sharma, Advocate For State/ Respondents No. 1 to 3 : Ms Shailja Shukla, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 22-04-2025 1) Heard on admission. 2) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondents No. 5- 12 took a loan from the petitioner - bank and when the borrowers defaulted, an application U/s 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 was moved before the District Magistrate, Raipur which was allowed vide order dated 17.02.2020. He contends that revenue authorities have not complied with the order passed by the District Magistrate, Raipur under the provisions of Section 14 of the Act, 2002. He prays that a direction may be issued to the respondent No. 3- Tehsildar, Raipur to take appropriate action. He also prays to not press relief clause No. 10.2. 3) On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes. 4) Heard. 5) Taking into consideration the fact that respondent No. 3 – Tehsildar, Raipur is not taking any action pursuant to the statutory order passed by the District Magistrate – Raipur dated 07.02.2020 regardless of the fact that Tehsildar is under obligation to comply with the order passed 3 by District Magistrate, this petition is hereby being disposed of directing Tehsildar, Raipur to take appropriate action pursuant to order dated 07.02.2020. 6) It is expected that the authority concerned shall take immediate action in this regard. 7) With the aforesaid direction(s), instant writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.04.25 15:27:40 +0530