CHHOTU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WPIL/1234/2025 · 2025-12-10
Subhash Vidyarthi
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180488 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180488 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1234 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Hom Narayan Awasthi, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Hariom Singh, the learned State Counsel and Shri Pankaj Gupta, the learned counsel for Gaon Sabha.
2. By means of the instant petition filed in public , the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction for removal of encroachment made on land bearing Gata No.59 measuring 0.0200 hectare situated in Village- Katka Maraitha, Tehsil- Kaiserganj, District- Bahraich, which is recorded as submerged land.
3. On the basis of written instructions provided by Tehsildar, Tehsil- Kaiserganj, District- Bahraich, the learned State Counsel has informed the Court that an order under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 has already been passed for removal of encroachment but presently an application for setting aside an ex-parte order is pending.
4. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed off by issuing a direction to Tehsildar, Tehsil- Kaiserganj, District- Bahriach to proceed with the recall application/application under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 expeditiously, in accordance with law. December 10, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hom Narayan Awasthi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Chhotu .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue U.P. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench