HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7233 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution has been filed with following prayer:- "To direct the opposite party no.1 decide to interim relief Application pending in revision no.1860/2025 computerized no. C202504000001860 U/s 210 U.P. Revenue Code 2006 relating to village - Tahapur, Ambedkar Nagar Expeditiously with in stay stipulated as fixed by the Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice." 4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in the revision preferred by the petitioner respondents have appeared and filed detailed objection but no interim order has been passed on the application for interim relief while on the other hand interference is being caused by the respondents on the disputed property for which there is requirement for expeditious disposal of the interim relief application. He further submits that the respondents have been served. 5. Learned State counsel does not oppose the aforesaid prayer. 6. Accordingly, considering the aforesaid submissions the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 i.e. Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to consider and decided the application for interim relief with expedition, say within six weeks from the date service has been effected on the respondents, in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kaushal Tiwari, Shashi Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Shiv Sahay And Others .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Commissioner Adminstration, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) case there is no legal impediment. 7. In case, it is not possible to decide the same within the time prescribed above, he shall decide the same within two weeks thereafter. 8. It is further provided that in case it is not possible to decide the application for interim relief the respondent No.1 shall consider passing ad interim injunction if a case is so made out. December 16, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 7233 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench