HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 8014 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. November 19, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Saxena Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Amit Kumar Singh Bhadauri, Anshuman Patnaik (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Govind Ballabh Upadhyaya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Deptt.Of Energy Sectt.Lko.Andors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench